cell 1-508-487-1956  home 1-508-487-0512    
SKYPE 508-338-3006

- 52 Languages- SITE TRANSLATOR BELOW 

CLEVELAND CAPE COD BEACH AND OTHER WEDDINGS

CapeCodWeddings.@live.com
SWINE FLU LIES                    WWW.WEDDINGCAPECOD.ORG



Pathopractic of confrontation
against
compulsory vaccination DOCTATORSHIP

In general and anyway: no one has to follow 

an ORDER  to BE VACCINATED AGAINST THIER WILL.

Cooperating is unthinkable for every he or she be it for the reason alone that this would 

mean to take part in the crimes of the medical doctors (see: criminal charge).

Now, if somebody, for example at his workplace, still is bothered with a vaccination, confront 

the medical doctor with the following statement and demand his signature.

In some countries the medical doctors demand a written consent to the vaccination. 

By that consent people are meant to indemnify the doctor against all liability and to hold him 

harmless of all responsibility for any kind of damage due to vaccination. Turn the issue into its

 opposite: confront the medical doctor with the entire burden of legal consequences in terms of 

both criminal and civil law!

Declaration of refusal to be vaccinated

Herewith I refuse to be vaccinated. My will has the highest legal priority. My refusal is mandatory 

for the medical doctor.

According to the World Medical Association?s Declarations of Tokio and Lisboa it is worldwide 

forbidden to all medical doctors to take action against the patient?s will. No medical doctor 

is allowed to force medical measures, here: vaccination, on the patient. For every doctor those 

medical norms have the status of law and are legally binding. A medical doctor must not obey 

any law that is contrary to those declarations.

Every vaccination compulsorily executed against my will constitutes an act of grievous bodily harm 

and dangerous bodily injury, up to insidious attempted murder.

The mere attempt itself to force vaccination on me by threatening me is forbidden and punishable as 

criminal coercion.

It is well known already that the vaccine to be used contains neurotoxins and metabolic toxins. 

Severe bodily damages are to be expected: headache, vertigo, concentration disorders, tooth loss,

 diarrhoea, stomach and intestinal ulcer, visual defects and hearing defective, speech disorders 

and impaired balance, paralysis, rising from the feet up to lethal respiratory paralysis, cancer, 

damaging of liver and kidneys, Alzheimer?s disease, autism of children. These damages are 

documented and known to the medical doctors.

The information about a large number of other ingredients is withheld. Therefore it must be 

reckoned with additional life-endangering complications, for example by unforeseeable allergic 

reactions up to lethal shocks.

In terms of criminal law: grievous bodily harm and dangerous bodily injury, insidious 

attempted murder.

In terms of civil law: the medical doctor is liable without limitation for all my bodily harms and

 injuries occuring as a consequence of the vaccination.

Aware of these things,

in execution of his, the medical doctor?s legal guarantee-position (statutory duty and responsibility to 

protect the patient in any way, Garantenstellung),

and to avoid a criminal charge that otherwise will be brought against him,

the signing medical doctor declares that he will not perform a vaccination against my will.

Furthermore, the medical doctor opposes and counters every attempt ? e.g. an attempt of 

administrative character ? that coerces me to give my consent. The named declarations of the 

World Medical Association demand that from him, too.

 

Signature of the medical doctor, his name, place, date.

PDF of the declaration for printing

If the medical doctor signs it means you have imposed your will on the medical doctor and the 

vaccination will not be carried out.

If the medical doctor does not sign then note his name on this sheet, including place and date, 

and add: Mr/Mrs (name of the doctor) has refused his signature. With that, too, your opposing-will 

against the vaccination is documented and a vaccination will not be carried out.

For the rest it is a matter of: Always with a representative! (It may be more than one).

Here is the text of an authorization for representation that is ready for and takes into consideration 

all eventualities:

 

Authorization

I, .....................................................................................................................................

born ................................ .........................................

at the moment kept in hospital or wherever,

appoint and authorize according to the corresponding juridical regulations

as my representative

Mrs/Mr............................................................................................................................

address:.........................................................................................................................

My representative is authorized to safeguard and to defend my interests and me in 

all matters related to my current detention.

My representative is authorized, in case of compulsory medical treatment, to detect 

all the facts and circumstances, especially to bring in a charge against the responsible 

doctors for all legal reasons.

With this, I release everybody from keeping the professional secret towards my 

representative. My representative is allowed to examine and to get access to all 

the files and records concerning me and to make the corresponding copies.

My representative must be completely informed about every medical measure 

against me, especially he must be informed about the medications which are

 administered to me (quantity, effects, trade mark and active substances, etc.).

This authorization also includes the right to represent me and to defend me in case of

 imminent guardianship and custody, also in respect to all housing and property matters.

My representative is authorized to take all means of legal redress, resp. to take all legal

 steps and to engage a lawyer for me, if necessary.

My representative must be immediately informed about all the measures concerning 

me (see my respresentative?s address above).

Supplement:

In case of death, my corpse immediately or as soon as possible is to be rendered 

unusable, unusable for any doctor or anything medical*. Any kind of autopsy, any 

kind of organ-removal or anything corresponding to that is strictly forbidden. Every 

violation of this, my will, will be persecuted by criminal code. Also any medical 

treatment and any kind of medical intervention which precedes that.

 

Date................................................................................................................................

 

Signature......................................................................................(a copy is deposited)

 

* Cremation yes / no (please delete where inapplicable)


PDF of the authorization for printing

 

How to use the Authorization for representation / Power of Attorney

(Representative in illness? matters)

Compulsory admission to a hospital, compulsory therapy ? does it exist? Every therapy is compulsory 

therapy. Psychiatry is only the smallest part of the whole. No illness cries for therapy and treatment, 

but for new-revolution by virtue of illness.

Make sure in time that you have a representative in illness? matters (somebody, chosen by yourself, 

and prepared for that purpose! But not a lawyer, none of us, by no means a doctor, nor a medicine 

student, brief: no specialist; because the guardian will not be far. Attention! Only what you do by 

yourself in matter of liberation counts.).

Many already do this worldwide. Times of discussion are over. The lowest level of attack against 

compulsory treatment for everyone is the judicial level. Legal charge, a chargefor all juridical reasons

against any intrusion or attack, is the least (the text: "for all juridical reasons" is sufficient. More legal 

argumentation (such as legal sections) is not needed in any legal charge. Why saving the prosecuting

 attourney any work?). The representative (could be also several ones, simultaneously and alternately)

 also has to control justice, even beyond a iustitium. Anything else, for example the so called psychiatric

 will (rest in peace!) is in effect collaboration, hypocrisy and treachery.

Therefore: Pro-illness being the principle, the warfare against the medical doctors is the strategic main 

point, if that is being missed no end of oppression and no beginning of liberation in not any of the 

liberation movements will ever be feasible, no utopathy, that is: no human species, ever. That?s our

 theory of revolution. And the practice, the pathopractice?: We all are already, as different as we are 

amongst ourselves, most closely bound to each other, at least as close as illness is bound to any 

single one of us. That?s the strongest binding force. Who attempts to bring about separation, will be

 experiencing it.



 


 THE TOPICS, OF COURSE YOU WILL HAVE TO CHANGE NAMES 

AND ADDRESSES TO FIT WITH YOUR LOCATION:

 

 

To the

Staatsanwaltschaft beim Landgericht Berlin

Public Prosecutor?s Office at the Berlin District Court

Turmstr. 91

10548 Berlin

Germany

26.08.2009

Info: distribution list

 

Nowadays, botch-up is done nowhere else that much than on life itself. And there is no doubt that it is the medical doctor who has got the most direct access to life. What is indeed appearing in the form of life is nothing but illness. Under the pretext of illness the medical doctor is acting and practicing in all fields: botching, eliminating and eradicating life.

The medical doctors? newest botch-up against life: vaccination, under the pretext of the so-called swine flu.

Hereby, I file

criminal charges

for all legal and juridical reasons

1. against the Robert-Koch-Institute, legally represented by its President,
ordufer 20, 13353 Berlin


2. against the so-called Permanent Commission on Vaccination 

(Staendige Impfkommission), legally represented by its chairman, Seestr. 10, 13353 Berlin,

3. against the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, legally represented by its President, 
aul-Ehrlich-Str. 51, 63225 Langen.

4. The present charges are pressed prospectively also against all their 

subsequent medical accomplices in the local public health offices.

 

The above-mentioned are

accused

of

causing dangerous bodily injury (German Criminal Code, section 224: ? 

by administering poison or other noxious substances ? shall be liable to 

imprisonment up to ten years),

causing grievous bodily harm (German Criminal Code, section 226: ...

 if the injury results in the victim losing his sight in one or both eyes, his hearing

, his speech or his ability to procreate, in losing an important member, in being 

permanently disfigured or in contracting a lingering illness, in becoming paralysed,

 mentally ill or disable ? the penalty shall be imprisonment up to ten years),

causing bodily harm while executing a public office (German Criminal Code, 

section 340: ... liable to imprisonment up to five years),

coercion, while executing a public office (German Criminal Code, section 

240: ... liable to imprisonment up to three years),

attempted murder on a mass-scale (German Criminal Code, section 211: ...

 liable to imprisonment for life),

coercion of constitutional organs (German Criminal Code, section 105: ... 

liable to imprisonment up to ten years),

forming terrorist organisations (German Criminal Code, section 129a: ... 

liable to imprisonment up to ten years),

preparing a war of aggression against the own population (German Criminal 

Code, section 80: ... liable to imprisonment for life),

high treason (German Criminal Code, section 81: ... liable to imprisonment up 

to ten years).

Apart from that: lifelong revocation of the license to practice medicine for 

all the involved physicians!

The above-mentioned are to be arrested and detained in solitary confinement. 

There is danger of suppression of evidence. The offences reported are offences

 liable to public prosecution. They are to be prosecuted by official duty.

Reasons:

Once again there will be deaths and lots of people seriously damaged, invalid 

and mutilated. It has always been like that in any vaccination. This time, too, the

 medical doctors will be sparing no effort to cover up their perpetratorship. For 

it is most obvious already: Not illness is the enemy, but the medical doctor. 

The cause of death: the medical doctor.

I.

The legal requirements for vaccination are not fulfilled

There are three criteria that must be met for the implementation of mandatory 

vaccination (Protection against Infection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz): section 

20, paragraph 6), namely that

"a contagious disease"

"with a clinically severe form occurs"

"and its epidemic spread is to be expected."

None of these criteria is met.

As a matter of fact:

there is not any danger of a contagious so-called swine flu virus

there is no "clinically severe form"

there is no "epidemic", let alone a "pandemic".

The present flu is said to be the least harmful that has ever occurred since years. 

You can read it everywhere. Thus there is no "clinically severe form". The WHO, 

however, in order to declare a so-called worldwide pandemic, has changed the 

existing criteria and requirements in a surprise coup. The required "clinically 

severe form" was dropped without any further ado.

The "dangerous pandemic" ? it doesn?t exist ? is coming solely from the terror 

spreading poison cauldron of the WHO. As if the weather forecast announced a 

storm warning, when calm prevails. However, they who sow the wind ? .

Who is benefitting from this? Shocked by the "pandemic" threat ? there is no "

pandemic" ? the safety regulations for the production of a vaccine have been 

suspended, carte-blanche authorizations have been granted through expedited 

proceedings. The advantage: the obligatory test series ? time and money 

consuming, sometimes they can last up to 15 years ? are not to be applied. 


Great ?golden? times and first-class conditions for the medical doctors and 

their medicine business altogether.

The present flu is harmless ? till now and as long as nothing else will be added,

 e.g. a vaccination. Then, a totally different reaction will be triggered.

Question: The new vaccine, which is supposed to protect against the so-called 

"swine flu", why does it contain bird flu viruses ? the bird flu, according to medical

 information, being one of the most fatal world threatening epidemic plagues?!

What they call vaccine is a deadly substance. Therefore their warnings that 

something might "mutate", "jump across", and then, at the latest, things were 

getting bad and bader! The sole thing that jumps across is vaccination.

In terms of criminal law:
he one who administers and injects vaccines, makes propaganda for 

vaccinations, or makes organisational provisions for their implementation, 

commits bodily injury on a mass-scale, is a mass murderer dangerous to 

public safety and conducts a war of aggression against the own population. 

The incriminated perpetrators are to be arrested and detained in solitary 

confinement. There is danger of suppression of evidence.

Is the 1976 vaccination massacre going to be repeated?!

Back in 1976, in the USA: "swine flu", yes, indeed: the same "swine flu", as at 

present, once again. That, too, was an epidemic delivered from medical doctor?s

 hand, from US-laboratories. The first cases occurred in Fort Dix, a few sick people 

and one dead soldier. This served as the pretext to declare a US-wide swine flu 

epidemic and to spread terror. The nationwide vaccination programme led to severe 

damages of life and limb of the people. Previously the medical doctors and the 

vaccine profit makers had put the government under such pressure that finally all 

liability clauses were cancelled. Nobody would ever be able to hold them to account

 for it. Thus they knew what they were doing.

The mass vaccination had to be abandoned overhastily, the medical doctors? 

programme crashed down. The US-Health Minister lost his job, the chief executive 

of the Centers for Disease Control had to resign. From October 1976 till winter 

40 million people had been vaccinated. The outcome of that therapy: the mortality

 rate was higher and had exceeded the mortality rate of comparable winters without 

vaccination.

That "swine flu" passed into history as the "epidemic that never took place". However,

 today the dead are still dead, and the crippled and injured are still crippled and 

injured.Must that be repeated? Was there nothing learnt from it?

The one who administers and injects vaccines, makes propaganda for vaccinations, 

or makes organisational provisions for their implementation, commits bodily injury on

 a mass-scale, is a mass murderer dangerous to public safety and conducts a war

 of aggression against the own population.

 

II.

Vaccinations are medical fraud manoeuvres; in their effects weapons of mass 

destruction employed against a population which, to a large extent, is 

unsuspecting and suppressed

Vaccinations are inefficient, except that they cause damages. This is well known 

since the time of the first vaccinations. In 1796, the English country doctor Jenner 

cut the peoples? skin to infect them with harmless cowpox in order to find out 

whether these would have an effect on the frightening human smallpox. Jenner?s 

son died. Jenner could never provide any evidence that by the means of cowpox 

there could be achieved immunisation against human smallpox. Later on, it was 

Jenner himself to warn insistently against the dangers of vaccination. But the 

vaccination business had already got going and the doctors were keeping all 

vaccination accidents secret. The gloriole of HEAL was outshining all the dead 

people. There are some who are in darkness / And the others are in light / And 

you see the ones in brightness / Those in darkness drop from sight.

In India, the World Health Organization was carrying out vaccinations on millions 

of people for seven years and a half, against tuberculosis. The catastrophic result 

was to be kept secret; but in 1971 it came to light nevertheless: the vaccination 

against tuberculosis was totally ineffective. But the profit millions had rolled in.

In 1930, in the German town of L?beck, 250 children were subject to forced 

vaccination against tuberculosis. More than a quarter of the children died 

immediately,

 and there was hardly any child who got away without a handicap. This experiment, 

of which the deathly outcome was well known, was repeated 40 years later on a

 mass-scale in India by the World Health Organization, with the same, previously 

known results. Today, thousands of Indians are still marked badly by the injuries of 

that vaccination ? if they have survived at all.

Helpers in words ? hangmen in deed: the World-Hangmen-Organization. India, the

 so-called Third World, the poor people, grateful for any help, this crime scene had 

been selected by the WHO with caution, that is to say with every malice and

 insidiousness. Already Paul Ehrlich, originator of the chemotherapy, and his kind 

had raged themselves out with their medical experiments in the colonies, which 

were at those times still German, and they were raging by far more worse than the

 later KZ-doctors, some of them hanged in Nuremberg in 1947. Paul Ehrlich was 

awarded the Dynamite Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1908. Today there is the Paul 

Ehrlich Institute. The latter being here under criminal charges.

Vaccinations are the medical doctors? botch-ups, bio-weapons coming from the 

medical laboratories.

Microscopic living organisms, harmless, being since millions of years in good-

neighbourly friendship associated with their respective host-animal, are brought 

together by the physicians with alien organisms, in the laboratories forced to copulate,

 to cross-bred medicartificially (swine + hen + rat + bird + ?). The outcome? 

A new vaccine, for instance, which, in its composition, is indistinguishable from a 

biologic bomb.

The whole mixture is enriched among others with the industrial toxins quicksilver 

and aluminium as well as formaldehyde, notorious for its cancer-causing effects. 

Vaccines are but toxic waste drawn on the syringe, neurotoxins and metabolic 

toxins in their effects. What they call vaccine is a deadly substance.

The damages due to poisoning are not limited to the vaccinated people. They tend 

to expand to their direct descendants. These damages are handed down to future 

children.

The one who, after having received a jab, complains of a headache and suffers from 

vertigo, cannot keep anything in mind and cannot sleep, feels uneasy and is tetchy, 

suffers from tooth loss, diarrhoea, visual defects, hearing defective, or speech 

disorder, looses his balance during walking, is affected by paralysis, rising from 

the feet up to lethal respiratory paralysis, if intestinal and stomach ulcers develop, 

cancer and damages to the liver and the kidneys, Alzheimer?s and Parkinson?s

 disease, knows from where he and she has got them. No doctor will reveal it to him 

or her, ever. Children are even hit worse than others. The more vaccinations, the 

more autistic children. The doctors know that already for a long time.

In terms of criminal law: the elements that constitute the crime of bodily injury 

are met, and likewise evident is the intent to commit a homicidal act.

The chronic sufferings, in turn, are once again very well exploitable, bring in profits, 

research funds and highly remunerated assignments in institutes. But that at least one 

of the medical doctors would finally decide to pipe up and to talk about the damages?

 Never ever.

These damages are the rule and they occur so frequently that a separate law was 

drafted at their regard. Thus they know what they are doing. The one who has 

suffered damage from a "protective" ? Yes! ? protective vaccination, will be given 

a provision

 and medical care and remedial gymnastics and ortho-paedagogical and movement 

therapy, pursuant to the Protection against Infection Act. On application. However, the

 approval of the relative request is preceded in most cases by death. No, not by the 

death of the medical doctor who has administered the vaccine, but the one who dies,

 long before his time, is once again the mistreated patient, whereby all his claims 

expire, and thus the authors of the damages he has suffered and his torturers are 

being absolved.

The medical doctors know only too well that by administering vaccines they bring 

in the heavy artillery for their assault on human kind.

They very wisely refrain from doing it to themselves.

The doctors themselves don?t want to be vaccinated. According to a recent 

survey of the Aerzte-Zeitung (Medical Journal) summer 2009, the physicians give 

as the reasons (literally):

"It is obvious that the vaccination does not provide any protection either".

"I, as far as I am concerned personally, I don't think that I will be infected".

"Influenza is not a severe illness".

"I am afraid of the harmful side effects of the vaccination".

? ? ? ? ? Isn?t that crazy?! ? ? ? ? ?

 

III.

Compulsory vaccination is prohibited

The next vaccination, too, will be followed by deaths and lots of mutilated and 

crippled people. It has always been like that in any vaccination. Vaccination is 

still voluntary. But that is only the beginning of it. Forced vaccinations will be tried 

next, already this time or later, depending on the resistance the medical doctors 

are encountering.

Compulsory vaccination is prohibited.

There is the fundamental right to life and there is the fundamental right to physical i

ntegrity. Each vaccination constitutes a prohibited intervention in the fundamental 

right to physical integrity and is therefore punishable as an act of causing grievous 

bodily harm and dangerous bodily injury and as attempted murder.

Nobody can be forced to let himself be injured or killed by vaccinations. The 

Protection against Infection Act states:

"The ? subject to vaccination, who according to medical testimony cannot be 

vaccinated without danger to his life and health, has to be exempted from the 

vaccination requirement."

(Protection against Infection Act, section 20, paragraph 6)

Each vaccination is accompanied by a threat to life and limb. Everyone knows that. 

The "medical testimony" requested pursuant to the Protection against Infection Act 

is long since available. The expected damages caused by vaccination, which have 

been calculated already now in 250,000, need not be certified another time and in 

detail. Each of the vaccinations that have already taken place bears witness to the 

mortal danger and the damages it entails. Each single vaccinated a blood witness.

"Medical testimony"? For instance that of the German Medical Association, which, 

by its declaration of no impediment and no-objection to all nuclear power plants, 

gave the starting signal for the various Gorleben, Asse, Kr?mmel, Biblis, Grohnde, 

Gundremmingen, Brokdorf, W?rgassen, which, as nuclear power plant and terminal 

storage site (whose termination?) are now emitting blood cancer en masse. Not one 

single word against that on the part of the medical doctors, who, once again, have 

been covering up the whole matter under their white coats of silence, or on the part 

of the medical officers of the local public health offices (the medical officer?s duty

 of care! Legal guarantee-position from which the duty to intervene arises!), who 

have never provided a "medical testimony" on the "threat to life and health"; "public 

health offices", the medical class?s selection ramps for compulsory sterilisation and

 mass murder, the corresponding law from 1935 still being in force till 2006, as Federal

 Law, the same health offices which now are to implement the vaccination.

Chernobyl was built with the same Western technology that had received the German

 Medical Association?s blessings. Without the memorandum of the German medical

 profession in favour of nuclear power plants Chernobyl would have never occurred.

Non-proliferation treaties against nuclear weapons? Atomic Energy Agency? Blind 

and tame towards the medical doctors, that destructive and final solution class.

"Medical testimony", here: on the risks due to vaccination? It?s but a foolish joke.

 Damages en masse to the life and limb of others have never been the slightest 

reason for the medical doctors to intervene.

Quite on the contrary:

The Permanent Commission on Vaccination, the perpetrators heading the attack


 against the life and limb of the population, makes profits on the fear of illness, which 

has been fomented by the Commission itself: young girls are called upon to get 

vaccinated at all costs against the "lethal cervical cancer"!

All the rest warned against it. But they ignore that, because a lot of money is at stake:

 for the discovery of the allegedly cancer causing virus, in 2008, the Heidelbergian

 physician Harald zur Hausen was awarded the Nobel Prize. In the prize awarding 

committee were sitting the representatives of exactly the same pharmaceutical group 

which, today, is achieving a turnover of billions with the vaccine. Those who entrusted

 in the "recommendations" of the Commission on Vaccination and got vaccinated are 

struggling against the damages still to this day. Meanwhile, the former president of the 

Permanent Commission on Vaccination has found even a full-time job in a big 

medicine company.

Not one single word of the "Permanent Commission on Vaccination" about the 

ofdangerousness of this vaccination, never ever.

That means:

"The ? subject to vaccination, who according to medical testimony cannot be 

vaccinated without danger to his life and health, ?"

will be vaccinated anyhow. No medical doctor will ever testify against that.

So far as to the "medical testimony", which is supposed to attest vaccination damages.

When will there finally be put a stop to the criminal business of these botchers?!

 

IV.

The national budget has gone bankrupt, the treasuries are depleted, but still millions 

and millions have been made available for the "largest vaccination project in history",

for a vaccination that

is not needed (there is not even the least threat)

is untested (usually the mandatory test time is 5 years)

is rejected by everybody (the doctors themselves don?t want to be vaccinated)

is only causing damages (see all the vaccinations in the past).

The vaccination campaign is a HEALpolitically conducted worldwide terror campaign 

planned by the medical doctors. What they call vaccination is but a large-scale 

experiment on human guinea pigs. The dead and crippled people that are to be e

xpected have already been counted in statistically and are part of the calculation.

The WHO has changed without further ado the so-called pandemic criteria. They 

announced the highest threat level. No, not because there is an actual threat ? in 

reality, such a threat does not exist ?, but this is rather a strategic-tactical operation 

conducted by the World Health Organization serving the purpose of the further 

expansion and widespread of its terroristic health-dictatorship, in short: its 

DOCTATORSHIP.

The WHO-strategy paper on AIDS, 1989: they ought to generate a strong threat. 

Since it were unknown how to handle the right degree of fear different 

proceedings concerning AIDS should be tried out. The most developed and efficient 

options could then serve as a pattern for other diseases.

The WHO meets all the constituant facts of operating as a worldwide terrorist 

organisation.

And then the World Health Organization put its plan of attack into practice:

In 2005, the whole world was whipped into fear of the so-called bird flu, especially 

by the WHO-threat that 150 million people would die. Actually, there died 200 

people. No, not of the "bird flu virus", that medical spectre. But they were dying 

under the bombardment with chemotherapy, being isolated in plastic tents, 

segregated from the world outside, defenceless abandoned to the medical doctors, 

exactly the same way, as we know it from torture chambers. There, too, it?s medical 

doctors who are torturing with injections causing respiratory paralysis and then giving 

therapy with reanimation devices.

Then, in 2006, was surprisingly found the miraculous medicine against the "lethal 

bird flu". The arcanum: World Football Championship. Especially in Germany, the 

host country, there were nationwide miraculous healings in great numbers. Had the 

Vatican kept a record of them, they would have gathered sanctifications en masse. 

Not one single case of "bird flu" anymore, as soon as the first game was kicked off.

Before that, in 2003, the so-called SARS, the same horror scenario, screenplay, 

here too, by the WHO: Again, the WHO prophesies: Millions will die. There died 54 

people. Each of them under medical treatment.

Recall the striking timing: the SARS-show coincided with the US-attack on the Iraqi 

oilfields. A worldwide epidemic alarm thus serving the purpose of distraction.

Then, the WHO announces victory on SARS. SARS, so they claim, had been 

refrained by the means of quarantine and the monitoring of the supposedly infected

 ones. These methods, so they claim, were much more efficient than medicaments.

After a few days, there is already the next "malicious virus" circulating in the mass 

media: "Smallpox alarm because of a giant hamster rat is keeping the USA in 

suspense. The authorities are considering protective vaccinations, initially on a 

voluntary base". The one who got infected would catch a fever, pus-filled pustules 

and attacks of sweating (by no means anything life-threatening).

Then, in quick succession the next blow: the "West Nile Virus", very dangerous as 

well, disappearing just as quickly. Then, flanking the terror, lurid reports on new

 "killer viruses" en masse that would be sitting in ambush in the Amazon primeval 

forest. Nothing of all that did ever exist in reality.

From all that follows:

There has never been a plague, never a pandemic. All that is but 

scaremongering staged by the WHO for the purpose of holding down 


the people. 

Therapism = Terrorism.

Is there even the slightest sign that this time, with respect to the "swine flu", 

things are any different? The people are knocked down to keep still. Though 

they would have got every reason to attack.

A world in turmoil must be brought under control. Far beyond all system boundaries, 

across all political, ideological and religious differences, the WHO rules over all states

. While, with respect to SARS, being still reluctant, meanwhile China too is knuckling 

under to and collaborating with the WHO. The WHO chief, at present, is a Chinese 

she-doctor.

The incriminated persons at the Robert-Koch-Institute, the Permanent Commission 

on Vaccination, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute and at every local public health office are 

accomplices in the cold coup d??tat of the WHO. The separation of powers 

anchored in the constitution has been abolished. It is Iatrocracy that rules 

(the domination of the medical doctors? class).

The deeds of the perpetrators constitute the following crimes:

high treason

coercion of constitutional organs

forming terrorist organisations

preparing a war of aggression against the own population

grievous bodily harm and dangerous bodily injury

coercion by and while executing a public office

attempted murder on a mass-scale.

However: Each of the incriminated can refuse allegiance to the 

World-Hangmen-Organization straight away and stop the planned mass vaccination, 

in order to protect the population. The WHO has no executive powers towards 

the respective countries.

Whole countries have already got rid of the WHO-yoke. Mexico has declared the end

 of the swine flu epidemic on its own initiative, and by that the WHO was sent packing.

Medical doctors over here as well, even medical associations, are already leaving the 

sinking ship, trying to avoid being called to account.

Farmers, too, have already been resisting forced vaccination of their livestock against 

the so-called blue tongue disease. The farmers know: it?s the vaccination that kills

 their cows, and calves are born dead or malformed. They also know that the blue 

tongue disease does not cause any harm to anybody, that it is harmless even for 

humans, and that the meat from these animals can be eaten without hesitation. 

Thousands of farmers have been demonstrating against compulsory vaccination.

 If thereby any veterinary or other medical doctor came to harm, was not reported.

The only true and appropiate, causally efficacious, efficient and promising 

combat against epidemics: Get rid of the medical doctors? class! The sooner t

he better for human kind. The Constitution (article 20, paragraph 4, Right to 

resistance) demands everybody to do so.

 

V.

A look at the past, to sharpen one?s sight of the things that are to come

Also in 1918/19, during the infamous so-called Spanish flu, infamous because it is 

still used to the day by the medical doctors as a spectre for the purpose of therapeutic

 terror, it was not "the disease", but the medical doctors and their therapy who were 

guilty of the deaths of 50 million people, worldwide.

US-Army doctors had the recruits maltreated with up to 25 different vaccinations.

 After the vaccinations against typhus and yellow fever there were deaths en masse. 

Thereafter still stronger vaccines were used, and thereupon there were still more 

damages and deaths. Instead of finally ending their vaccination programme they 

were administering even more drastic vaccines. Human typhus secretion was injected

 into pigs, and both was mixed with chicken egg protein. The outcome of that medical 

botch-up: the so-called Spanish flu, a new epidemic, tossed together in the medical

 poison cauldrons and spread through vaccinations.

The first cases occurred in US-army camps, in Camp Devens and Camp Fuston,

 training camps in World War One, and from there the medical poison was spread 

all over the world.

Against that epidemic, fabricated by the medical doctors, they massively

 prescribed Aspirin. Aspirin, placed on the market for the first time in 1890, was the

 first drug that was taken to the market under a completely meaningless or rather 

deceptive trade name in order to keep its ingredients secret.

During World War One Aspirin was used in the field hospitals as a pain-killer and 

in all types of common cold. By that, fever was suppressed. With fever, with illness 

as protest, people would have been armed and protected. As Heraclitus, 2500 years 

back, already knew: Give me a proper fever, and nothing can harm me.

There are hearts that can bear Aspirin, and there are hearts that can bear a flu. 

However, a flu and, in addition to that, Aspirin, that last medicine even the strongest 

natures did not survive. People who did not lack anything suddenly collapsed in the

 middle of the street, dead. The cause of death: the medical doctor.

In the end, there were 50 million dead people, worldwide. Compare: in World War 

One 20 million dead people.

Who and what is thus the most devastating weapon of mass destruction against 

human kind? It?s the medical doctor and his therapy. Under the pretext of illness 

the medical doctor is acting and practicing in all fields: botching, eliminating and 

eradicating life.

There are international treaties for banning chemical, biological and atomic weapons.

  When will there be a banning of medical doctor & therapy?

What has this got to do with us, here and now? The difference: the victims of that time

 are already dead. But for those who live, the following is the most important:

During the Spanish flu all those survived who had refused any vaccination. Those 

who kept the cause of death: the medical doctor at distance, did not suffer any 

harm. They all survived, without any damages.

They had no trust in the medical doctor and they knew the formula that protects

 against death and infirmity:

If you see a doctor

Knock him down at once!

Defence strengthening, enormously. Probatum est. This life supporting magic 

formula today is massively in use, all over the world. Thanks to the SPK!

 

Books published on the perpetratorship of medical doctors (for instance 

The Poisoned Needle, 1957) had been intercepted by the US-doctors and made

 disappear. That?s nothing out of the ordinary. The German medical doctors? class,

 too, had made sure that reports on the mass murder they had committed in the 

concentration camps (Mengele & colleagues) did not even come into publicity. 

They had bought up the complete edition of the documentation "The Dictation of 

Contempt for Mankind / Medicine without Humanity".


Summary:

There is no pandemic. There is instead the terror staged by the World Health 

Organization for the purpose of holding down the people. Therapism = Terrorism.

The legal requirements for vaccination are not fulfilled.

Vaccinations are medical fraud manoeuvres; in their effects weapons of mass 

destruction employed against a population which, to a large extent, is unsuspecting 

and suppressed.

The consequences and the damages are well known.

The one who nevertheless administers and injects vaccines, makes propaganda 

for vaccinations, or makes organisational provisions for their implementation, 

commits bodily injury on a mass-scale, is a mass murderer dangerous to public 

safety and conducts a war against the own population.

The incriminated perpetrators are to be arrested and detained in solitary confinement.

 There is danger of suppression of evidence.

In case, the German judiciary remains inactive as to the penal prosecution of the 

medical perpetrators, there still exists the option of transferring the court of jurisdiction

 to Libya. For the medical doctors who have vaccinated to death others, precisely 

children, there is the hangman still waiting, and the same rope, at which, already 

in 1947 in Nuremberg, many a medical glory has found its early end.

Perhaps Amnesty International will intervene: Write in a polite manner and ask for 

an early execution.

 

Signature

 

PDF of the criminal charge for printing

Pathopractic of confrontation against compulsory vaccination DOCTATORSHIP

The WHO-swines make the flu that does not exist

Stop the medical doctors? iatrobiontic warfare against all people! Make front against it!

Iatrocracy on a World-wide Scale

 

Far and wide as the eye can wander, norm and worth obstruct the world

But above them illness towers, not for miles and miles alone

We are the illness? people, creating out of allness, the world

We are the illness? people, creating out of allness, the world

 

Up and down the times are heading, only illness does persist

Flight would mean a sure death facing, would the jackers suit allright

We are the illness? people, creating out of allness, the world

We are the illness? people, creating out of allness, the world

 

Onwards, onwards, each and every, human species we strive for

Where there all the separate people are united as a whole

We are the illness? people, creating out of allness, the world

We are the illness? people, creating out of allness, the world

 

Curses on you, class of doctors, go to hell to meet your kind

Always there will be tomorrow, only this direction?s right

We are the illness? people, creating out of allness, the world

We are the illness? people, creating out of allness, the world

PF/SPK(H), 11.09.2009






 

 



BELL TOLLING for the Swine Flu (CAMPANAS por la gripe A) subtitled from ALISH on Vimeo.

Also available at YouTube here: 
VIDOEO INTERVIEW IN THE UKRAINE 
205,000 sick in Ukraine Swine Flu Pneumonic Plague 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF3EzY7TVkk

================================================== 
TRANSCRIPT OF VIDEO OF NUN-DOCTOR

Here's a transcript of the first three videos: if anyone feels like making it 

more readable, feel free, I just think it's important to get this out there. 

Every word she says is true.

Transcript (Part 1):

Bell tolling for the Swine Flu Interview with Teresa Forcades 
Monastery of Saint Benet Montserrat- Barcelona 
9/23/09

TC: Teresa Forcades has corrected on the subtitles some of the figures 

and data quoted in this interview.

My name is Teresa Forcades i Vila. I am a Benedictine nun at the 

Montserrat monastery. Before joining the monastery I practiced 

medicine for several years.

I'm a physician specializing in internal medicine and I have a phD in 

Public Health at Barcelona's University. I carried out the specialization 

in the USA, at the State University of NY.

What we call swine flu (A), it's also called, mainly in Catalonia, "the new

 flu" this term (the new flu) may lead some people to believe that the "A" 

type flu virus is a new virus. Well, this isn't a new type of virus. "A" type 

viruses are part of the yearly common flu... the seasonal flu.

Regarding flu viruses we have, maybe everyone's aware of this, but I 

always start with the basics, we have A, B, and C type viruses. These 

are the known flu viruses affecting humans. Because the "C" virus only

 normally affects a smaller proportion of the population, it's not used for 

the manufacturing of the yearly vaccines. Therefore every year seasonal

 flu vaccine is a mixture of "A" and "B" type virus.

Therefore the so-called "new flu," or swine flu, is not new because of 

being an "A" type. Then some could argue that it's new because of the 

antigens of the A-H1N1 virus, the hemagglutinin (H) and the 

neuraminidase (N). These are surface proteins that could appear to give

 it the novelty nature. Well, this isn't the case. It must be said, these 

proteins are not providing a novelty nature to this virus. Because this 

same group, A-H1N1, was the same flu virus group that in 1918 caused 

the terrible pandemic that killed more than 20 million people worldwide.

 It was this same type of virus, and it existed amongst the population until

 around the mid 50s. In 1957 it seems to disappear from what is known 

as seasonal flu viruses. It disappears and reappears in the year 1977. 

This can be looked up by any physician or anyone, in the New England 

Journal of Medicine, where last month, an article was published about 

the history of flu viruses, and I quote the New England Journal of Medicine 

as it's the most well known and respected medical journal.

The article confirms as fact that this virus reappeared (the A-H1N1 virus)

 in 1977 because it had been resynthesized in a lab. Therefore it came 

from a lab. And I say resynthesized but it seems that what happened was

 that they went to exhume the body of an Inuit, and Eskimo woman who 

died from this flu in 1918, as her body remained under the ice it was 

possible to recover from the tissues the necessary elements to produce 

again, or to resynthesize this virus. To recap, this happened in 1977, and 

according to the New England Journal of Medicine, this is an established

 fact. From 1977, we have then the A-H1N1 flu virus being part of the 

pool or mixture of the seasonal flu viruses.

Well, what is then new this year? The novelty is the viral strain S-OIV. 

This year's viral strain (S-OIV) is a strain unknown until now. And it's this 


new strain which was first diagnosed on April 17th, 2009. It seems that's

 the origin of the first diagnosis with two cases in California. These are the

 first cases on record when we first heard about a new virus. Therefore the 

novelty is just the strain S-OIV. 
This is the first scientific fact.

The second important scientific fact to bear in mind is that since it began 

on April 17th until September 15th, which is when I last read the statistics

, the figures recorded (now, I'm quoting this figure by heart, so it may not 

be exact but I won't be so far off), 137 deaths worldwide [TC: 137 in 

Europe, 3,559 deaths worldwide]. Therefore having already gone through

 the South hemisphere countries, through what's called Austral Winter, 

with this new virus, and having had a lower mortality rate than usual 

during this period. The numbers, as I say, are by heart, but from April 17th

 to September 15th, 137 deaths in Europe and 3,559 worldwide. And I 

quote them because, it's important to do so. There have been lots of 

declarations, but I'll quote one by a member of the National Medical Ethics 

Committee of France, whose name is J. Dupre. Or for instance, another 

by the President of the General Spanish Medical Association, Rodriguez 

Sendin. Both prestigious doctors have confirmed that, based on the 

scientific data that we have at hand, that this new virus has a lower 

mortality rate than the common flu, or than common seasonal viruses.

I'll end this scientific part with an important note, an important piece of 

data fully accredited on medial literature, that says that people older than

 60, have already a 33% immunity against this new virus. These are i

mportant objective facts to take into account before getting into an in-

depth assessment.Next, I'll mention two irregularities that have taken 

place in the way or 

the consequences so far of the discovery of this relatively new strain. 

The irregularities remain, to my understanding and to the understanding 

of any objective observer, they've remained unclarified, and they're too

 serious to remain unclarified.

Firstly, the investigative journalist Jane Burgermeister, [TC: she pressed

 bioterrorism and mass murder attempt charges against the WHO, the UN,

 and some CEOs of companies, and governments], a journalist born in 

Switzerland with Austrian and Irish citizenship, heard about what I'm 

about to tell you now, and she was the one who made the information 

available. Anyone can verify that the information that I'm going to disclose

 is accurate and objective.

What happened?

At the end of January 2009, and so before this new flu was the newly

 discovered flu, Baxter Pharmaceutical, a USA company with a very

 important subsidiary company in Austria, proceeded to distribute from

 the Austrian subsidiary company via 4 neighboring European countries 

(Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany), to 16 different laboratories, 

vaccination material for the flu, which was material for the vaccine to 

be administered between February and March to the population of those

 countries, for the seasonal flu virus vaccine. This material weighed 72kg.

Well, I haven't calculated the exact number of doses, but it certainly means

 thousands and thousands of doses. So, this was distributed. And here 

comes the point when, through one of life's coincidences, situations or 

plans are revealed which would have otherwise remained in the dark. 

The Czech Republic company BioTest was one of the recipients of this

 material, and one of their lab technicians decided, through his own 

initiative, and as something he was qualified to do but not obliged, to 

carry out an extra security test with the vaccination material they 

received before proceeding to its distribution. 
So, before the distribution of this vaccine, what this lab technician did 

was to inoculate this vaccine to animals called in Spanish comadrejas,

 or hurones (weasels or ferrets), small mammals that have been used 

since 1918 to test flu vaccines. He inoculated these weasels and all of 

them died. When he observed these unexpected deaths, and given that 

the inoculated vaccine shouldn't have caused the death of the weasels, 

he immediately raised the alarm and they began checks to establish

 what this material received from Baxter contained, because if its contents

 was a vaccine, the death of all the animals was inexplicable.

Transcript (Part 2):

The results of the analysis showed that in the material delivered by Baxter 

to those 16 laboratories, two live viruses coexisted. One was the bird flu 

virus that appeared in 2005, and that caused a high mortality rate but

 infected just a few people. The number of deaths worldwide, and I quote

 by heart, was around 250, but as far as we know, around 60% of those 

infected died. This means that if 250 died worldwide, just around 600 

got infected, whichever the exact number is. Therefore the mortality rate 

of this virus is very high, but its infection rate is minimal. The virus was

 mixed with a seasonal flu virus, that, as we all know, has an extremely l

ow mortality rate, it means lower than 0.01%, but with a high degree of 

transmission (i.e. highly contagious). If you mix these two viruses and 

then distribute it to thousands of people, what you're doing is you're

 maximizing the probabilities for these two viruses to merge, for them to

 recombine, and for a new virus to appear that is both very lethal and very

 infectious. This is a fact and has been officially admitted by Baxter, [TC:

 They have admitted that the contamination took place, but not that the 

material was destined for human use. Claiming protection behind the 

confidentiality rights, they haven't disclosed information about its

 destination]... that the total of 72kgs of the material contained mix of 

live bird flu and seasonal flu viruses. This is a fact.

Could this have happened by chance?

It is extremely unlikely. And I say this because in science the word 

"impossible" is something we never say. What does it mean, "extremely 

unlikely"? It means that laboratories handling these kinds of viruses have

 bio-security levels in place. Bio-security Level 3 is the highest, and the 

one that must be applied in this laboratory. It means that if we talk in a 

science context about probability, based on known facts, the probability

 that this may have happened by chance is extremely low. Not only this: 

how can we explain the mixing of two different live viruses? But also

 because the flu vaccine, as we all know, is a vaccine made with 

attenuated viruses. "Attenuated" means that the virus must go through 

a radiation procedure. These viruses found in the Czech Republic and 

in the whole Baxter material hadn't been attenuated. It is important to be 

clear about how unlikely it is for an accident to occur under these 

circumstances.

In any case, this has happened and it's under investigation. 
This journalist, Burgermeister, has pressed charges, not only against 

Baxter, but also against the WHO (World Health Organization), she has 

also pressed charges against governments of important countries, 

because it seems that, with the information at hand, it's more probable t

o think in terms of malicious intent, rather than think that there have been

 a series of chance events almost impossible to conceive.

But, and I insist, it's very important to separate objective facts from those 

which haven't been proven yet. I think that the good thing about this video

, about this information we are facilitating, is that it may reach the wider 

public, the more people the better, about the existence of plans from a 

World Elite that wants part of the population to disappear, or even much

 of the population... that when hearing all this they say, "but... where's all

 this coming from? This is science fiction. I've never heard about this...

" I know that there are people who have been studying this for a while. 

But I wish that my message reached someone who says..."Look I don't

 know anything about that stuff, but I've just heard that there was a 

laboratory that delivered a contaminated vaccine, and that, interestingly,

 (I haven't mentioned this but it's a fact), it's one of the laboratories in 

charge of making flu vaccines this year."

Well, this fact alone makes it justifiable to myself to think that until such 

time as an explanation is given about why this contamination took place

, I won't wish it on me, on my child, nor on anyone close to me. I don't 

know if I've been clear enough about this point. Because I think it's 

important to make it clear.

I'd like to get to the second irregularity because there's a second one 

even more scandalous than this first one. The second irregularity 

happened as follows: 
What I said about Baxter happened in February. I've also said that on 

April 17th we had the first diagnosis of the new flu. Well, on April 29th, 

twelve days after those two first cases were discovered, WHO's Director

-General, Dr. Margaret Chan, (the World Health Organization depends

 on the United Nations), made a public appearance and announced a 

Level 5 Worldwide state of alert for the prevention of a pandemic. 

What does this mean? Level 5 is quite a high level, after 5 there is only 

Level 6 left. Level 6 means the pandemic is already happening. 

One month and a half later, on June 11 2009, Dr. Margaret Chan 

announces Level 6, the maximum level of health alert. 
We then have a global pandemic of the A-H1N1 flu virus.

How could Dr. Chan and the whole World Health Organization 

already declare a pandemic, taking into account that this virus has a

 mortality rate lower than the yearly virus?

Then, how come there isn't a pandemic every year, if the yearly virus is

 worse than this new virus? Well, the answer is quite simple. The answer 

is that this year, in the month of May, the WHO changed the definition of 

"pandemic" from its then current definition of an infection by an infectious

 agent simultaneously present in different countries at the same time and

 with a significant mortality ratio to the proportion of the infected population.

 They removed from the definition, this mortality characteristic. Therefore

 the new definition went to describe the pandemic as a simultaneous

infection present in various countries and carrying an infectious agent 

showing any novelty characteristic, thus leaving us unable to know the 

type of immunity present within the population. This is a definition I'm 

quoting from the British Medical Journal.

So I insist that all this information I'm giving doesn't come from the 

alternative press, for whom I have great respect, but I think it's important

 to know that all this information comes from the most prestigious 

magazines, and absolutely "mainstream" as they say in English. 

So this amended definition is from May 2009. If the mortality requirement 

disappears from the definition of pandemic, as I said, then we should 

ask ourselves, what prevents the annual common flu from being declared 

a pandemic? The answer is, with this definition, nothing prevents it. 

With this definition, what we are seeing now, with this investment... 

and I'll get now into the political consequences, which is in fact where 

I wanted to get to... all that is happening now that seems to be justifiable 

because of its exceptional nature, under the new definition, it wouldn't 

present anything exceptional about it. So this would be the situation 

year after year, and this is just with the flu, not to mention other diseases

 with the same characteristics. One may say, "wait a minute, isn't it true

 that this virus is less lethal, that it presents a lower mortality rate than 

the annual flu virus, and this fact can be read everywhere, everybody 

says so, even our health minister here, they admit this is the case. 

Well, if this is the case, how can it be that a pandemic has been declared,

 bearing in mind the serious political consequences which we'll talk about 

now. So this is simply what I'm putting together.

Perhaps the new piece of information that I'm giving is this (and I insist 

it's from the British Medical Journal): that the definition of a pandemic 

has changed, but this can be seen by anyone, by asking WHO to send 

you the pandemic definitions for 2008 and 2009, and there you can see

 that this change exists. It can also be read on their website, etc. In the

document that I'm disseminating, I also quote an article from an American

 journal, where they explain that after visiting the WHO website they 

commented, "listen, here it says that high mortality is a pre-requisite 

for a pandemic, and here nobody dies.e They told them, wait a minute, 

and they changed the definition on the web. This article has been

 quoted and it's from CNN, which is not a source under suspicion 

in this sense.

Transcript (Part 3):

Therefore the WHO irregularity seems even more serious to me, 

because it's equally objective, clear and easy to verify, and it brings

 us closer to the possible real consequences. So it's not just about 

elaborating on possible intentions or who did what.

As you see, I've stopped there, because I like to distinguish between 

what I can prove from what I cannot, but about what's already happening 

now because of this definition. To end this part on the irregularities, in the

 USA, due to the 11th June 2009 pandemic declaration because of the 

new virus, this same month the USA declares a Public Health National

 Emergency, [TC: on April 26, 2009], which also carries political 

consequences, and this emergency declaration was possible in the USA,

 having at the time, in the month of April, twenty cases of infection and 

zero deaths.

With twenty cases of infection, all of them documented, I won't get into

 the documentation as I don't wish to drag on, but it's also important 

to know that the documentation is not so reliable, it's not so simple, and 

also it's not being carried out now. It was in June or July 2009 when WHO

 said to stop verifying with lab tests who had swine flu or not. In the U.K.

 for instance, they do it through a phone consultation where the person 

reports the flu symptoms, then they note down swine flu. This is the way 

it is done now. Therefore when they say there are 12,000 or 13,000

 cases, whichever number they say now, it's very important to be aware 

of the way that these figures are worked out. Once again, these are 

objective facts that can be verified on the official web, WHO, and I'm 

quoting by heart but I think it was in July 2009, said that there was no 

need to verify every case in the laboratory, therefore we're assuming that 

every flu is a case, and in some countries (in many others they don't even

 do this), in some countries they're making surveys based on "we had 

100 and 50 were swine flu cases, so we assume that the rest are also 

that way", but this is a generalization, lacking sufficient data, at least on

 the ones that I've seen in the books, and these are the irregularities.

Now I'll move on to the third part, which focuses on the political 

consequences of a pandemic declaration. Well, it's as simple as this: 

WHO is an International Organization that normally issues 

recommendations. Then it's assumed that each sovereign country applies 

or not the recommendations following its own criteria, its own 

circumstances, and its own internal research. In 2005 this changed, 

allowing an exception precisely in case of a pandemic.

Now, in case of a pandemic, WHO doesn't make recommendations, 

it give orders. This means that the countries (again, this is a verifiable 

and objective fact) in the case of a pandemic, the countries... and a 

pandemic is something very serious... a pandemic is, well, as in the old

 definition, is a real serious threat to the health of the whole population, 

and that justifies this medical emergency, at least within the context of the 

old definition, not in the one that we have now. Therefore with the present

 definition, well, the title has remained the same, global pandemic, 

but its contents have totally changed, because the significant mortality r

ate doesn't exist. But the political consequences remain because of the 

heading. There the law says, "In case of a pandemic..." or the internal 

rules, or WHO's regulations, within their treaties and agreements with the 

member countries. So from 2005, when faced with a pandemic, WHO 

doesn't recommend but orders member countries which actions to take. 

That's why we hear from the authorities in Catalonia and the whole of

 Spain, "We're awaiting WHO's recommendations..."

Perhaps that's a manner of speech, but it's not just that they are waiting f

or them because they think it's the right thing to do, but because they 

have to abide by them, not as a recommendation but as an order from 

the moment that it's issued.

Well, you may ask, what terrible thing may arrive? Well, the mandatory 

vaccination. This is the most important point to me. It is very important 

to spread this information so that even if the vaccination is offered on a

 voluntary basis, the larger number of people who know about the 

circumstances surrounding this vaccine and all the facts that we're telling,

 the better, so that each one of us can make an informed decision.

The point we're going to talk about now is slightly different, its about the 

real possibility that this vaccine was issued, or distributed, or announced

 as a mandatory vaccine.

And how can it be possible that I'm forced to have, or accept a vaccine 

that I don't wish to have? Well, the reasoning is quite clear. If we are in a

 global pandemic situation, although in the present situation it doesn't 

quali

 this may put other people's health at risk. Therefore the countries are 

under obligation to ensure that the law is obeyed.

If this is the law, what would this mean? Well, the same as usual: fine

 or prison. Talking about fines, it seems that in Massachusetts, a 

document has already been made public in preparation for a possible 

mandatory vaccination. If this was the case, the fine would be $1 per day, 

or could reach up to $1,000 per day. So the thing works this way: 

You say, "no I don't want to get vaccinated" -Oh, OK. Then look, $1,000 

daily from civil service, for every day you don't get the vaccine. This is a 

way. Other ways that are happening already now, but this without the 

general law of obligatory nature, there are companies that say to their 

workers, "if you don't take the shot, I fire you". There are open lawsuits 

in different countries, in the US, in the UK, in France, because there are 

people who have already faced this dilemma, and that have tried to refuse, 

in some cases in private companies, where there's no collective labour 

agreement, in the US for instance, this has already made people lose their

 job for refusing to accept this vaccine. And you may say, "but there's no 

vaccine yet", Not yet, but the one that is already in distribution, because 

here in the monastery, we already have it, and it already exists, is the one 

for the seasonal flu. This has been delivered sooner, because the WHO has recommended to give the seasonal one and then, in most cases, in two 

doses, the new flu one.

And now I'm going to talk about this. What may happen to a person who 

refuses to get this vaccine? If the vaccine is not mandatory, and by now 

it is not in any country, then nothing happens. You say no, and sign a 

document if necessary, and the same for your children, they don't get it 

and no problem.

If the vaccine was mandatory, as I said, fine or prison, as it is what must

 be done in a country, if this is a law, it must be obeyed, if not this would

 be a joke. Let's see. Facing this, this daily $1000 fine, or facing the 

possibility of a prison sentence, one would say, "let's not exaggerate,

 I got the vaccine every year, or not me but my father has, or I know people

 who get it, so we simply get it this year and it's alright look a disaster, 

they're making money, as always, as happened with the papilloma. 

But what can I say, I'm not paying $1000 a day, or I'm not risking 

going into prison".

Facing this possible answer, it is important to know three factors that

 makes the vaccine of the swine flu, of this year's flu, to be different to 

every year's vaccine. I mean, this argument of it being the same as 

every year's vaccine, but this time it's for the swine flu virus. Well, 

when we take it, we've been fooled once again, by politicians or 

whoever, but it's not going to be the last time.

Three novelties, that this vaccine has, in contrast with the vaccine of e

very year. Why is this vaccine not going to be the same as every year?

The first novelty is, I have already said it, because WHO recommends

 most of the pharmaceutical companies that are producing this vaccine,

 recommend it to be given in two doses. This is a novelty. Nobody has 

ever heard before that flu vaccines come in two doses. Normally it's given

 once and that's all, next year you take it again, but it's never given in

 two doses. This year it comes in two doses, and also, as I said, WHO 

has already recommended, in fact, the vaccine delivery has already 

arrived at senior care homes, monasteries and other places, so that 

everybody takes the vaccine for the seasonal virus. If the WHO's 

recommendations are followed this year, those who follow them, 

will end up receiving three flu vaccinations: the seasonal one, and 

the first and second doses for the swine flu. I've also heard that some

 laboratories produce it with just one, but most of them have announced

 it will be a vaccine in two doses. That way, the possibility of secondary 

effects is multiplied by three, and these vaccines do have secondary 

effects. But this is theoretical. In practice, nobody knows what could 

happen, because it's never been done before. Because no one has 

ever before received three doses of the virus, three shots with live 

viruses of the flu, and from different types, one after the other, in the 

middle of a supposed pandemic or flu season. This is the first novelty, 

this is new.